Temas, métodos y resultados de investigación sobre TikTok/Instagram y lectura. Revisión sistemática bibliográfica. (Spanish)

Previous studies on social networks and reading, such as those by Sorensen; Mara, 2013; Jeffman, 2015; Hughes, 2017; Cruces, 2017; Lluch, 2021 o Amo Sánchez-Fortún 2021 focus their attention on blogs and YouTube as spaces in which content related to reading is created. This systematic review aims to know, synthesize and assess the research on the last two social networks, Instagram and TikTok, where readers, authors, companies and institutions speak, recommend or sell books. With this objective, searches have been carried out in the SCOPUS, WOS, LISA, and LISTA databases and in the specialized search engine Google Scholar. The search has identified 1006 records; after screening, scientific articles, research papers, and academics dealing with books, reading, Instagram, and TikTok from different approaches were included, and the quality of the studies was assessed using the CASPe checklist. Finally, the corpus of the review has been made up of 66 documents that come, for the most part, from Spain and the US; they began to be published in 2016 and belong mainly to the areas of communication and journalism and libraries. Depending on the type of document and the database, the majority line of research wants to know 1) what the account administrators are like, 2) what kind of content they share and how; 3) what librarians use and how publishers and bookstores use them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Los estudios sobre redes sociales y lectura, como los de Sorensen; Mara, 2013; Jeffman, 2015; Hughes, 2017; Cruces, 2017; Lluch, 2021 o Amo Sánchez-Fortún, 2021, centran su atención en los blogs y en YouTube como espacios en los que se crea contenido relacionado con la lectura. Esta revisión sistemática pretende conocer, sintetizar y valorar el estado de la investigación sobre Instagram y TikTok donde se habla, se recomiendan o venden libros, evaluando la calidad de los estudios mediante la lista de verificación del CASPe. Con este objetivo, se han realizado búsquedas en las bases de datos SCOPUS, WOS, LISA, LISTA y en el buscador especializado Google Scholar. La búsqueda ha identificado 1006 registros; después del cribado, se incluyeron artículos científicos, trabajos de investigación y académicos sobre libros, lectura, Instagram y TikTok. Finalmente, el corpus de la revisión lo forman 66 documentos, en su mayoría, de España y EE.UU. Dependiendo del tipo de documento y de la base de datos, la investigación mayoritaria quiere conocer 1) cómo son los administradores de las cuentas, 2) qué tipo de contenido comparten y con qué forma; 3) qué uso hacen los bibliotecarios, las editoriales y las librerías. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Tejuelo: Didáctica de Lengua y Literatura is the property of Tejuelo. Didactica de la Lengua y la Literatura. Educacion and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)