Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting
In: Van Der Knoop, B J, Vermeulen, R J, Verbeke, J I M L, Pistorius, L R & De Vries, J I P 2018, ' Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting ', Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 983-990 https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0360 Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 983-990. Walter de Gruyter GmbH STARTPAGE=983;ENDPAGE=990;ISSN=0300-5577;TITLE=Journal of Perinatal Medicine Van Der Knoop, B J, Vermeulen, R J, Verbeke, J I M L, Pistorius, L R & De Vries, J I P 2018, ' Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting ', Journal of Perinatal Medicine, pp. 983-990 . https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0360 Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 46(9), 983-990. Walter de Gruyter GmbH; (2018-12-01) S. 983-990
Online
unknown
Zugriff:
Aim: To determine acceptance of pregnant women to undergo fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in research and clinical setting. Methods: A prospective study included a research group [part of a study comparing brain ultrasound (US) to MRI in fetuses at risk for acquired brain damage] and a clinical group [fetuses with suspected (brain) anomalies after structural US examination] from 2011 to 2014. All women were advised to use sedatives. MRI declinations, use of sedation, MRI duration and imaging quality were compared between both groups. Results: Study participation was accepted in 57/104 (55%) research cases. Fetal MRI was performed in 34/104 (33%) research and 43/44 (98%) clinical cases. Reasons to decline study participation were MRI related in 41%, and participation was too burdensome in 46%. Acceptance was highest for indication infection and lowest in alloimmune thrombocytopenia and monochorionic twin pregnancy. Sedatives were used in 14/34 research and 43/43 clinical cases. Scan duration and quality were comparable (21 and 20 min in research and clinical cases, respectively, moderate/good quality in both groups). Conclusions: Pregnant women consider MRI more burdensome than professionals realize. Two-third of women at risk for fetal brain damage decline MRI examination. Future studies should evaluate which information about fetal MRI is supportive.
Titel: |
Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Bloeme J. Van Der Knoop ; Vermeulen, R. J. ; Verbeke, Jonathan I. M. L. ; Pistorius, Lourens R. ; Johanna I.P. de Vries ; Obstetrics and gynaecology ; Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D) ; surgery, Pediatric ; Radiology and nuclear medicine ; Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Restoration and Development ; Human Movement Sciences ; AMS - Restoration and Development |
Link: | |
Quelle: | Van Der Knoop, B J, Vermeulen, R J, Verbeke, J I M L, Pistorius, L R & De Vries, J I P 2018, ' Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting ', Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 983-990 https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0360 Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 983-990. Walter de Gruyter GmbH STARTPAGE=983;ENDPAGE=990;ISSN=0300-5577;TITLE=Journal of Perinatal Medicine Van Der Knoop, B J, Vermeulen, R J, Verbeke, J I M L, Pistorius, L R & De Vries, J I P 2018, ' Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting ', Journal of Perinatal Medicine, pp. 983-990 . https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0360 Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 46(9), 983-990. Walter de Gruyter GmbH; (2018-12-01) S. 983-990 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2018 |
Medientyp: | unknown |
ISSN: | 0300-5577 (print) |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|