MODELS OF STATE THREAT RESPONSE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STABILITY IN UKRAINE

Problem setting. Socio-political stability has universal universal historical significance, since it belongs to the basic qualitative characteristics of the states since their emergence. The rhetoric of stabilization is inherent in both totalitarian (authoritarian) and democratic countries. In the first case, on the basis of it, the political system is preserved, which makes it impossible (significantly weakens) the mechanisms of rotation of political elites and leaders, which is approximated to society in the form of slowing down of sociogenesis, slowing the pace of development of the country, stagnation of certain social fragments. In the second case, the public authorities demonstrate their ability to democratically secure stable signs of the development of basic public spheres and institutions over their volatile antipodes. The consequences of this are state-building constructivism (accumulation of positive results), successful implementation of modernization strategies, strengthening the country’s position in international relations, creating systemic preconditions for the progressive development of society, etc.One of the main negative stimuli against socio-political stability is the multifaceted threats that have both objective leaks (social, natural, technogenic) and subjective determinants. Their purpose is loosening, weakening public institutions, reducing the effectiveness of the state, the depletion of the economy and more. At the same time, the tendencies of diversity of threats, their mutual influence and integration («hybridization») become quite obvious. This requires a timely prediction ofprocesses of state response to threats to socio-political stability, based on appropriate models.Analysis of recent research and publications on the topic. The essence, content of socio-political stability, ways of its achievement in different power formats were investigated in the works of V. Volynets, I. Kiananka, V. Koliukh, Y. Kondratyev, V. Lagutin, Y. Levenet

Рассмотрены основные модели государственного реагирования на угрозы об­щественно-политической стабильности - консервативная и адаптивная. Указано на принципиальное различие между этими моделями - степень вовлечения гражданского общества в деятельность по противодействию угрозам. Доказано постепенный переход Украины от консервативной к адаптивной модели реагиро­вания на разноплановые угрозы общественно-политической стабильности.

Розглянуто основні моделі державного реагування на загрози суспільно-політич­ній стабільності - консервативну та адаптивну. Вказано на принципову відмінність між цими моделями - ступінь залучення громадянського суспільства у діяльність щодо протидії загрозам. Доведено поступовий перехід України від консервативної до адаптивної моделі реагування на різнопланові загрози суспільно-політичній ста­більності.